Clarence Thomas’s monetary dealings have come beneath scrutiny following a collection of stories.
In a 2001 speech, Thomas mentioned serving on the Supreme Court docket wasn’t value it for the cash.
A bunch of Democratic lawmakers desires to withhold funding from the courtroom till it adopts a code of ethics.
Justice Clarence Thomas — who has accepted lavish holidays and different monetary advantages from GOP megadonor Harlan Crow for years — mentioned in a speech in 2001 that serving on the Supreme Court docket wasn’t value it for what it paid.
“The job isn’t value doing for what they pay,” Thomas mentioned throughout a speech in 2001, The New York Publish reported on the time. “The job isn’t value doing for the grief. However it’s value doing for the precept.”
Thomas was talking to the Bar Affiliation in Savannah, Georgia, in response to the Publish. Within the speech, which was resurfaced this week by The Nation author Jeet Heer, Thomas mentioned his efforts to achieve custody of his then-10-year-old grandnephew. The Publish reported Thomas cried in the course of the speech and thanked his lawyer who labored on the custody battle.
In 2001, the wage for an affiliate Supreme Court docket justice was $178,300, whereas the chief justice made $186,300. As of 2023, the wage for an affiliate justice is $285,400, whereas the chief justice makes $298,500.
ProPublica reported this week that Thomas in 2008 despatched his grandnephew, the one referred to within the speech, to Hidden Lake Academy, a residential program in Georgia, and that Crow lined the $6,000 per thirty days invoice. The outlet beforehand reported that Crow had paid for Thomas and his spouse, Ginni Thomas, to take extravagant holidays, and that Thomas has offered his childhood residence to Crow however didn’t disclose the sale.
A bunch of 15 Democratic lawmakers now desires to withhold $10 million from Supreme Court docket funding till the courtroom adopts a code of ethics, The Hill reported.
Learn the unique article on Enterprise Insider
