Breadcrumb Trail Links
NewsInvestor
With almost 250 companies in S&P 500 nursing losses in 2023, roughly 1 in 5 fails to meet size threshold set for new members
Article content
The S&P 500’s pitch is simple: own it and get exposure to the biggest of the big companies in the United States. Lately, though, it’s become harder to maintain that point of distinction.
Chalk it up to the lopsided nature of this year’s equity advance, which has pushed megacap technology makers ever higher while punishing practically everything else. With almost 250 companies in the S&P 500 nursing losses in 2023, roughly one in five fails to meet the US$14.5-billion size threshold set for new members.
Advertisement 2
Article content
Article content
That’s about twice as many as normal, according to Bloomberg Intelligence strategists Wendy Soong and Gina Martin Adams, who studied quarterly data going back to 2008.
One is S&P 500 cellar dweller Sealed Air Corp., which after falling more than 30 per cent this year has a market value of US$4.8 billion, which is less than 225 firms in the S&P Midcap 400. Currently, 35 companies in the mid-cap gauge are larger than the smallest 50 members of the S&P 500.
Article content
It’s a lesser noticed consequence of the lopsided rally that propelled a handful of artificial-intelligence super stocks light years past the rest. At the other end of the size spectrum, companies left behind by the rally have shrunk to the point where they’ve become hard to tell apart from members of mid- and even small-cap indexes.
Besides creating quirks at the border, the blurred lines are a potential headache for quant investors who use size as an ingredient in factor strategies. S&P Global Inc., the benchmark’s administrator, has the capacity to redress the distortions, but is likely disinclined to do so in a timely fashion. It has traditionally balked at big reshufflings, and has in the past waited for markets themselves to iron out issues when they’ve cropped up.
Investor
Article content
Advertisement 3
Article content
“If an investor is trying to thoughtfully assemble a collection of funds because they’re trying to target a certain return or volatility goal, it becomes more difficult if they don’t have a certain degree of clarity around exactly what’s in their portfolio,” said Wes Crill, senior investment director at Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. “Let’s say you were trying to combine the S&P 500 with a small-cap focused strategy. You could have much more overlap between those two than you originally planned.”
The S&P 500 still dwarfs the S&P 400 in total size, with a weighted average market capitalization of US$80 billion among members, versus the mid-cap’s US$6 billion. That’s the number active managers focus on when grading their portfolio against a benchmark, and won’t change if the smallest companies at the bottom of the index are shuffled in or out, according to Steven Desanctis, a small-and-mid-cap strategist at Jefferies Financial Group Inc.
“Their weights are going to be small, their market caps are going to be small, it’s not going to change the weighted average market cap a whole lot,” he said. “But for passive folks, more turnover is a concern.”
Advertisement 4
Article content
The index asymmetry is unlikely to spark emergency action on the part of its overseers, who tend to consider rashness in switching members a bigger sin. In a heavily traded market, distortions are often temporary and self-correcting, the thinking goes. That restraint has helped the index avoid large-scale turnover during market routs, when a handful of companies drop below index inclusion levels, only to quickly bounce back weeks later.
A representative for S&P Global declined to comment, and instead referred to the firm’s index methodology, which states that “turnover in index membership should be avoided when possible.” An index constituent that appears to temporarily violate criteria is not deleted “unless ongoing conditions warrant an index change.”
Linger on
Unlike other index providers, S&P Global doesn’t have market-cap requirements for continued inclusion in the S&P 500. That means that stocks can linger in the index, even if they fall below the market-cap threshold.
The index provider also doesn’t have a so-called “reconstitution,” or an annual day when companies are added and deleted. While S&P Global rebalances the weights of companies each quarter, it typically leaves additions and deletions for when there’s new M&A activity. Unfortunately for new companies waiting to get into the index, the years-long drought in M&A has left the S&P 500 at its most stagnant since 2011, according to Bloomberg Intelligence.
Advertisement 5
Article content
“It’s a challenge that the S&P has always grappled with because of the fact that they don’t actively reconstitute,” said Melissa Roberts, head of quantitative research at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Inc. “For an index performer, that becomes a challenge, because then are you really capturing the largest companies?”
Related Stories
Microsoft record leads $1.5-trillion Nasdaq surge
Get ready, the Fed has cause for a pause
Money market funds spring a leak after year of record inflows
None
Roberts estimates there are at least 29 U.S.-listed companies that currently meet S&P 500’s index inclusion criteria, which includes market capitalization and several other factors. More companies have become eligible after S&P Global changed a 2017 rule that barred companies with multiple share classes from joining in April.
“If you’re a portfolio manager, you want the most accurate benchmark to reflect your performance, but if you’re a passive fund manager, you want less turnover because every time the index has turnover, there’s fees,” she said.
Bloomberg.com
Article content
Share this article in your social network
Comments
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.