When his workforce determined to call the XBB.1.5 variant of COVID-19 “Kraken,” Ryan Gregory by no means imagined it could resonate the best way that it did.
It was an arbitrary nickname, meant to be an enchancment on the complicated letter-and-number-salad system that led to official nomenclature like “XBB.1.5”—however actually not designed to make the general public suppose that this explicit pressure of COVID-19 was essentially the most monstrous but. “I at all times related [the word] with the foolish 1981 Conflict of the Titans film,” he says. “It’s tacky in a manner.”
Gregory is an evolutionary biologist at Canada’s College of Guelph and the unofficial spokesperson for the small group of scientists preventing for clearer (and catchier) pandemic nomenclature. The workforce, which features a science trainer from Indiana and lecturers throughout disciplines in Italy, Australia, and extra, first assembled on Twitter. There, they’d been assigning creature-based nicknaming efforts for COVID-19 subvariants they deemed vital lengthy earlier than they started receiving media protection for Kraken; they’d named others Gryphon, Basilisk, and Minotaur, for instance.
However Kraken drew the primary actual consideration to the challenge. And never all of that spotlight was constructive. When the identify caught on, some consultants expressed concern that it may unnecessarily stoke worry due to its monstrous connotations. In the meantime, the World Well being Group (WHO), which had led (and nonetheless does lead) the scientific discourse round COVID-19 nomenclature, remained conspicuously silent on the nickname in interviews on the time. “There was plenty of speak like, That is worry mongering, and it’s inflicting panic,” Gregory says. “And I’m like, ‘None of that occurred.’ In the meantime, the [WHO] was saying stuff prefer it’s essentially the most transmissible variant ever. That’s scarier to me than this goofy mythological identify.”
Learn extra: Why New COVID-19 Variants Have Such Complicated Names
Whether or not it was goofy or scary, the identify Kraken stole sufficient consideration to persuade Gregory and his colleagues that possibly they might have been higher off utilizing extra impartial names. So, on Feb. 13, the workforce debuted an up to date system with an intensive person information, which makes use of the names of constellations and different celestial objects moderately than mythological creatures. And in contrast to in an ordered system just like the Greek alphabet, Gregory is unlikely to expire of names. He’s acquired a protracted listing, he says, of “stars, planets, moons, feedback, galaxies…no matter.” It’s the citizen scientists’ second act, and the way it goes may train science communicators necessary classes about what individuals need as they study to stay alongside COVID-19.
The WHO’s preliminary plan, again in Could 2021, was that main lineages of the virus would every get their very own Greek letter. Alpha’s time within the highlight gave option to Beta, and so forth. However Omicron—the thirteenth named pressure—by no means stopped spreading, and because it did, it branched out, with new mutated variants extending out like tree trunks from an unique Omicron, most evolving even additional into almost indistinguishable subvariants. Utilizing a way referred to as Pango, which was developed by infectious-disease consultants on the College of Oxford and the College of Edinburgh and formally adopted by worldwide organizations in 2021, the company shortly acquired into what Gregory calls “variant soup,” with every subvariant given a Dewey Decimal-like identify with completely different letter and quantity components that assist you to monitor its actual lineage. That’s how you find yourself with information tales about difficult-to-remember however necessary subvariants like XBB.1.16, which is at present gaining traction within the U.S.
“It’s a really logical system,” says Gregory, however it’s a must to know how one can decode it. “The factor that considerations me a little bit bit is the World Well being Group is on this difficult place now the place there are variants they need individuals to find out about, however then they must check with technical names once more.”
“If persons are going to be speaking about it, in a non-technical context, it ought to have a nickname. That’s it for me,” he says. A virus, by some other identify, continues to be as infectious, however it’s best to at the very least be capable of bear in mind what it’s referred to as.
Learn extra: Why U.S. Specialists Can’t Agree on the Origins of COVID-19
The frequent names developed by Gregory’s workforce fill in what many have recognized as a niche left by a extra technical system that these exterior of science are unlikely to make use of. Initially the group assigned considerably arbitrary names of mythological creatures to any variant designated by WHO as a “variant of concern” or a “variant of curiosity.” Their revised frequent naming system is getting extra systematic, and contains new strategies of epithet-based indexing.
Gregory’s workforce has damaged the alphabet into 4 sections—one for every of the three largest Omicron lineages, and one for viruses from smaller lineages. These teams are represented by the primary letter of a subvariant’s frequent identify. If a reputation begins with letters A by H, for instance, it’s from the BA.2 lineage.
Moreover, if a variant is a recombinant pressure, which means it was fashioned from the mixture of two current iterations, the identify may have an R in it someplace, says Gregory. Take the primary variant the workforce nicknamed below the brand new system: XBB.1.16, or Arcturus. As a result of Arcturus begins with an A, it means it’s from the BA.2 lineage, and since it has an R in it, it’s a recombinant pressure.
Gregory believes that the brand new naming system continues to be doing the trick, even with out the dramatic connotations of Krakens and Minotaurs. ”Persons are referring to Arcturus,” he says, “and presumably discovering it useful to speak about this explicit variant.” Although Gregory believes it might probably simply work alongside and bolster Pango, the official teams which might be seen because the authorities in such decision-making, such because the WHO and the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention, have but to undertake the workforce’s new system or any of its terminology. Certainly, on Apr. 21, Maria Van Kerkhove, a WHO epidemiologist and the company’s COVID-19 technical lead, tweeted on the finish of a thread about XBB.1.16, “We aren’t utilizing nicknames for these subvariants, and I’d kindly encourage you to not. Please.” Gregory shared the tweet alongside a picture exhibiting “Arcturus” trending on Twitter.
He has some extent. Past Twitter, the nicknames are getting used broadly within the media and have even appeared in analysis papers and scientific journals. It’s a tug-of-war unlikely to finish anytime quickly, given how shortly the virus—and the way individuals check with it—proceed to alter.
Extra Should-Reads From TIME
