Koran-burnings to continue, despite Sweden terror threat

“Why shouldn’t I burn the Koran? There are only good reasons for doing so,” she told EUobserver in a written statement.

“Islam is the greatest threat to democracy and human rights,” she added.

“I want to be the voice of the victims who are being executed only for their complaints against Islam and its governments and nothing else — the people of Iran and Afghanistan, who live in the worst conditions imaginable,” she said.

The last time Bahrami burnt the Koran, also in Bromma, on 3 August, there were five Muslim counter-protestors, 15 journalists, and a handful of police.

The peaceful event, which took place on a rainy day, went largely unreported in international media.

There were also other Koran-burnings in Sweden in the past two weeks, Stockholm Police confirmed, which similarly fell under the international radar.

But three such protests earlier this year — next to the Turkish embassy, outside a mosque, and beside parliament — caused a global uproar, including violent anti-Swedish demonstrations in Lebanon and Iraq.

These burnings were carried out by an Iraqi protester called Salwan Momika and a Danish activist called Rasmus Paludan.

Bahrami told EUobserver she didn’t know either of them.

Paul Levin, an international relations professor at Stockholm University, said: “There are many factors that determine whether a Koran-burning is picked up by media and by various actors who have reason to protest it.”

“There may also be state actors who have incentives to inflame the situation and they may make tactical choices to try to amplify some, but not all, events,” he added, referring to past Arabic, Russian, and Turkish state media interest.

“It is hard to predict what will go viral and what will pass unnoticed,” Levin said.

But for its part, the Swedish intelligence service, Sapo, warned that the cumulative weight of events was creating danger.

“The threat of attacks from actors within violent Islamism has increased over the year. Sweden has gone from being considered a legitimate target for terrorist attacks to being considered a priority target,” Charlotte von Essen, the Sapo chief, said on Thursday.

She raised Sweden’s terrorism-risk alert from three (“elevated threat”) to four (“high threat”) — its highest level in seven years.

The top level is five (“very high threat”).

Sign up for EUobserver’s daily newsletter

All the stories we publish, sent at 7.30 AM.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

And von Essen warned Swedish people to be vigilant as they went about their daily lives, adding: “In this way we create a safer Sweden.”

Sapo upgraded its alert “not due to any individual event”, but for “strategic and long-term” reasons, it said in a statement.

Swedish prime minister Ulf Kristersson said on TV the same day “we know that planned terror attacks have been averted”, without giving details.

Levin, from Stockholm University, said: “Isis members have been arrested for planning attacks against Swedish targets in Turkey and an Al Qaeda TV channel last weekend encouraged Muslims to impart ‘revenge’ on Sweden and Denmark [which also hosted anti-Koran protests].”

Isis and Al Qaeda are designated as terrorist groups by the EU and the US. Denmark has kept its terrorism-threat level unchanged.

“We’ve observed attacks on Swedish embassies and consulates abroad as well as an international campaign that depicts Sweden as anti-Islamic. One person was shot at the Swedish consulate in İzmir [Turkey] in what’s now being treated as a terrorist attack,” Levin added.

“It seems quite clear that there’s a heightened threat level at the moment,” he said.

Rule of law

But despite that, Koran-burning is protected under free-speech laws in Sweden’s constitution.

And Swedish courts have said it doesn’t amount to incitement of hatred against Muslims.

“The general idea is you can’t limit freedom of speech and freedom of assembly just because other people get angry and might start committing acts of violence against the demonstrators,” Mårten Schultz, a law professor at Stockholm University, previously told this website.

“That would mean violent mobs could take away your rights,” Schultz said.

And when EUobserver asked Stockholm Police if they would handle security arrangements or applications for future Koran-burnings any differently in light of the Sapo upgrade, a police spokesman said on Friday: “Most likely no”.