Article 35A of the Constitution empowered the legislature in the erstwhile state to define its permanent residents.
According to Article 35A, all persons who were living in the state as of May 14, 1954, when the law came into effect, and those who have lived in the state for 10 years anytime since that year were counted as permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir. It had also granted permanent residents privileges, such as exclusive right to purchase land and get government employment.
The law was enacted to protect the distinct demography of the state.
However on Monday, the Constitution Bench led by CJI Chandrachud said that the law curtailed the rights to equal opportunity of state employment, acquire property and settle in Jammu and Kashmir for non-residents.
The court further said that the law had granted the state immunity from judicial review to these special privileges.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said on Monday that such rights division was “unthinkable” in a constitutional democracy.
Mehta also said that the government corrected itself in August 2019 by repealing Article 370, which granted special status to the erstwhile state, and Article 35A.
“I am not saying that or this government,” he said, adding, “‘Our government’ is what I say. The mistakes of the past should not befall the future generations.”
He also highlighted that since the Centre scrapped Article 35A, investments in the Union Territory had surged.
The permanent residents of the erstwhile state were “misguided” into believing that they were enjoying a privilege that none could take away from them, he told the court.
Also Read: UP has moved from BIMARU to path of developed state: CM Yogi Adityanath
